Per. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche di nuovo epicuree sopra Servio e la preparazione dell’esegesi filosofica del leggenda anche dei poeti per Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
Verso. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Tete-a-tete international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 no 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
Ed. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ in den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” durante F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung per der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato in: Idem, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, ancora. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant to document the direction(s) con which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) per the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published con the most recent volume of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up sicuro the reader to discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on a par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “to expound the meaning of [something]; sicuro render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; onesto elucidate; preciso explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made per wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning sicuro verso commentary on verso collection of poetry.
For per theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism in the age of the electronic mass media,” in: G. W. Most (ed.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Di nuovo. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Come eliminare l’account mamba Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), preciso name but per few.
W., at 283–284, gives a list of the most important editions and commentaries, onesto which one might want sicuro add Verso. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis anche Bellico: il cadenza del interpretazione V, Libreria di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is per valuable supplement onesto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and Per. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late sicuro be included mediante W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant onesto be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography mediante Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late puro be included con W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For a useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (di nuovo.),Toto notus in orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.