Nevertheless, they stays offered to the reader makes reference to which work, which is the essence off emptiness
Scientific studies, try steps, results and you will perceptions is invented from the mind, plus creativity and you can keyword and you will design programming. Suitable revealing of results is also vital. Particularly in theoretical physics, linguistic skill and you will carefulness whenever you are writing are getting a far more clicking you would like in the latest victims at the limits out of present education. Discover individuals from most other fields that are willing to misunderstand and you can spark unnecessary discourses/conclusions; they create instructions out-of a number of bytes of data including “yes/no/maybe”; consequently, nonscience or occult misinformation emerges, examples of hence abound throughout the fields out of special relativity concept and you will quantum physics. Hence, technology ought not to use the sentences one supported the brand new Paleolithic brain. Category: Standard Research and you will Philosophy
Trappist-step 1 Star System
The fresh James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will quickly transcend what the Hubble has been capable speak about. Among its first aim are going to be the fresh new TRAPPIST-1 star program from inside the Aquarius. This essay explores why that puny reddish dwarf is really fascinating, and exactly why this new search for alien existence models elizabeth. Category: Standard Research and you will Viewpoints
Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations 
of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy