g., geographic part, measurement away from MA, dimensions off math performance, sex, amounts level, and you can guide seasons), we held this new heterogeneity shot. The new Q shot (heterogeneity sample) have found the differences certainly feeling systems, thus to explore hence potential moderator (we.age., research have) could have starred a job during these distinctions try needed.
Geographic Part
Geographical regions was basically felt a potential reasonable grounds. The outcome models was indeed labeled with the five wider groups: You, European countries, China and other counties. The new analytical heterogeneity among impression versions is actually shown (Q = , p = 0.01). Particularly, the studies with Western examples had the prominent effect size (roentgen = ?0.41), once the knowledge having Western european samples demonstrated the littlest feeling proportions (r = ?0.21). At the same time, the studies around examples had a more impressive impression dimensions (roentgen = ?0.30) as compared to involved classification from inside the Europe, as they got an inferior feeling dimensions compared to involved group in the China.
Gender
This new modest analyses toward intercourse were conducted courtesy a couple of methods. Very first, the class on this subject variable is in keeping with Ma’s (1999) investigation, and we compared whether the math anxiety-results link is actually rather additional among three classes (male, women, and you will mixed); the outcome advised there are no variations one of several three classes (Q = 4.62, p = 0.099). Second, this study had a tendency to increase subsequent to check on when you should ban the fresh new confuse impact on the mixed category and you may whether or not the average correlations anywhere between men and women were somewhat different. Just 7 degree you to definitely given the fresh relationship between MA and you will math overall performance or necessary data will be gone to live in impact systems to possess other sexes have been dabble Fiyat integrated. The outcomes recommended zero factor ranging from female (r = ?0.30) and you will guys (roentgen = ?0.18) (Q = 2.73, p = 0.098).
Stages Level
Five levels-level groups were shaped in this meta-studies, together with a simple group, junior large class, elder highest category, merge category, and you may college category. The outcome ideal which changeable had high consequences towards the mathematics anxiety-show hook up (Q = , p = 0.02). Much more specifically, the older high category met with the biggest math nervousness-efficiency hook up (roentgen = ?0.44), followed by the fresh new junior higher class (r = ?0.39), college or university (r = ?0.33), elementary (r = ?0.27), and blended class, which had the littlest mathematics stress-abilities hook up (roentgen = ?0.21).
Publication Many years
The present day meta-investigation contains enough time figure regarding 19 many years (2000–2018). To check on if or not big date got an impact on the math nervousness-abilities connect, a Pearson correlation are used within publication decades and also the of all the individual studies (r = 0.27, p > 0.05). Zero relationship was receive between impression models and the publication ages (Contour 4).
Aspect regarding MA
We together with searched if the scales accustomed decide to try math nervousness got an impact on new mathematics stress-performance hook. The results suggested that the dimension away from MA had no impression to your math stress-results connect (Q = 6.54, p = 0.48). Particularly, individual degree which used other scales (age.grams., the brand new Math Nervousness Level for Elementary College People [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] encountered the largest math stress-abilities link (roentgen = ?0.41), with education that used the fresh MAS (r = ?0.40), MARS (roentgen = ?0.35), MAQ (r = ?0.28), MASYC (roentgen = ?0.26), CMAQ (roentgen = ?0.24), SEMA (roentgen = ?0.24), and you can AMAS (roentgen = ?0.24), and you will personal education that used the new MASC encountered the tiniest math anxiety-efficiency hook (r = ?0.15).
Dimension out-of Mathematics Results
The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).